You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register

Total War History
Moderated by Pitt

Hop to:    
Topic Subject: Royal Navy during Pax Britannia
posted 01-14-13 11:40 AM EDT (US)   
The more research I do, the more I gather that the active navy during this period was relatively weak?

It was only during the Navy Defense act of 1889 that the Royal Navy really began to become unmatched in the seas. But prior to that statistically the Royal Navy was hardly 'dominant' in the waves?

After the Napoleonic Wars almost 70% of the Royal Navy was cut down and decomissioned. Why is it that nobody took advantage of this.

France was economically in no position to do so but surely a nation such as Russia or America would challenge Britains position?

The great part is that Scab is apparently among such people. Yes. Greek Scab. My minion. -Stormraider

"Please don't grind on my wench and herr" - Bleedteals sister, asking me and herr not to grind her but mispelling

If he's not trolling I'll strip myself naked, paint myself green, and cheer for Ireland. -Coldviper. I'm still waiting for the proof....
posted 01-14-13 05:42 PM EDT (US)     1 / 1  
The Royal Navy was always drastically cut down in size after the end of a war. The same thing happened after the Seven Years War, for example.

That doesn't mean Britain didn't have the capability to expand the navy rapidly once more. Britain had a huge pool of experienced sailors to draw upon whenever it was necessary. Neither Russia nor America had this capability. It took time and a great deal of money to build ships of the line. Britain's principle of open seas also meant there was no economic gain to be had from supplanting it as guardian of the sea lanes.

The navy had to be reduced in size at the end of the war because it was incredibly expensive (Britain was burdened by large war debts) and so large that it was difficult to find enough sailors to man it effectively: British crews were the smallest of all the major naval powers, which partially explains the early failures in single-ship actions in the War of 1812.

D. Howarth, A Brief History of British Seapower London: Constable & Robinson, 2003), p. 351:

The navy's new work needed far fewer ships and men than the [Napoleonic] war that had ended. In 1815, there were over 700 ships, and 140,000 men: three years later, there were only 130 ships and 19,000 men.

... All those who remained in the navy were volunteers, and that made a basic difference in the sailor's life. The press-gangs came to an end in 1815 and were never used again; so did the system of sending civil offenders to the ships instead of prison.

The Royal Navy spent more time at sea than its potential rivals, giving its men more practical experience and making them more efficient. The post-war navy was a very professional one; more so than the navy that fought and won the war.

"Into the face of the young man who sat on the terrace of the Hotel Magnifique at Cannes there had crept a look of furtive shame, the shifty, hangdog look which announces that an Englishman is about to talk French." - P.G. Wodehouse, The Luck of the Bodkins
Empire: Total War Heaven » Forums » Total War History » Royal Navy during Pax Britannia
You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register
Hop to: